The WCAG ten
Captions, transcript, audio description, autoplay, keyboard access, focus, flashing, contrast, and pause control.
Media utilities
Walk the WCAG checklist for a published video, have the caption file checked mechanically, and download the report.
What it does
The ten WCAG success criteria that decide whether a published video is accessible, plus a mechanical caption pass.
Captions, transcript, audio description, autoplay, keyboard access, focus, flashing, contrast, and pause control.
Add the caption file and its timing, overlaps, and readability are checked mechanically.
Every answer becomes a pass, action, or review line with its WCAG reference: ready for the ticket.
How to use it
In depth
WCAG 2.2 gives specific requirements for prerecorded video: captions for audio (1.2.2), a transcript or media alternative (1.2.1), audio description when visuals carry information that narration omits (1.2.5 at level AA), user control before sound plays (1.4.2), and keyboard operation with visible focus (2.1.1, 2.4.7).
Many failures are easy to find and correct. Auto-captions can fail 1.2.2 when they change a name or number. A demo can fail 1.2.5 when the narration says "click here" and only the screen shows the target. A hero video that starts with sound can fail 1.4.2. The checklist gives context for each check.
Captions deserve the mechanical treatment on top of the judgment call, because a caption file can be present, accurate, and still broken: overlapping cues, sub-second display times, three-line walls of text. When you add the file, it runs through the same engine as the caption validator and the findings land in the same report.
The report is deliberately formatted for the workflow that follows: pass, action needed, or review per criterion, each with its WCAG number, downloadable as plain text. Accessibility work moves when it is a ticket with evidence, not a sentiment.
Questions
No. It is a structured self-check covering the video-specific WCAG criteria: the fastest way to find the obvious failures before a formal audit or a complaint finds them for you.
WCAG 2.2, criteria at levels A and AA: the range legal frameworks like the ADA, Section 508, and the European Accessibility Act reference.
Malformed and overlapping timestamps, blank cues, sub-second display times, over-long cues, and lines past readable length: the mechanical half of caption quality.
No. The checklist and the caption analysis run entirely in your browser, and the report downloads locally.
Related tools
These tools share engines and hand off to each other.
Check SRT and VTT files for broken timestamps, overlaps, and unreadable cues: then fix the safe problems automatically.
Open the tool →Translate a caption file into 19 languages. Timestamps, order, and formatting stay exactly as they are.
Open the tool →Convert SRT subtitles to WebVTT in your browser. No upload, no account, no watermark.
Open the tool →With Mindstamp
Mindstamp adds captions, chapters, and keyboard-operable interactions to the video you already have.